Monday, 20 July 2009
Graduation
Friday, 26 June 2009
Back Again
So the past few months have been incredibly busy. Ive done my IEMA coursework, just finishing my last week at the brain bank doing some of the most boring work ever and fitting in 2 games a week on top. Still, it makes a change from the winter, which had periods where getting out of bed before noon was an achievement.
I've been sleeping really heavily recently, which tends to give the best and wierdest dreams. Last night I woke up pondering whether anyone has written a sci-fi novel based on the idea that dreams are a window into parallel universes. Im sure its been done somewhere, but probably not at 3 in the morning. One for a spare few weeks in the winter maybe...
For those that dont know Im planning an ambitious trip to the states this winter, with the plan being to cross the continent on foot (crazy I know). Trying to work out how to string along some poor unsuspecting fool to join me, but that might prove tricky. It needs about 4 grand and 6 months to spare. Applications welcome.
Thursday, 23 April 2009
Dissolving a brain is easy...
A busy last few weeks, my laptop is now up and running and I hope to update more often again.
This week started with an interview for an internship with an environmental charity on monday morning. I spent sunday and the train into London preparing for the various standard interview questions. I think I had some pretty good responses lined up, but I hadn't reckoned on my interviewer's personality. He was Irish and he lived up to his stereotype exceedingly well. In what was a short 15 minute interview, I barely spoke for 2 minutes. This chap loved the sound of his own voice, so much so that he practically forgot to ask me any questions. When I did manage to fire in a response in between the long monologues, he interjected with, 'uhu' or 'Isee where you're coming from' and then went off on another one. He was a unstopable talking machine...
Anyway, not sure whether it ended up being a good interview, if you could call it an interview at all. Tuesday night at selection was a little hectic, having helped with colts and kept the bar for a few hours for the footballers.
The last few days Ive finally got some temping work in West London. Its basically preparing information packs for the Parkinsons Tissue Bank. Its extra busy this week due to it being Parkinsons week. Today we had an actually brain come in the mail. It really is very starnge, you get people ringing up when someone is on the way so that we can freeze their brain for transport to the lab. Apparently Jeremy Paxman is on our books, so if by some unfortunate happening, an interviewee on Newsnight were to give him his just desserts, I could well be looking at Jeremy Paxman's brain tomorrow morning.
Also, its possibly the only place in the world where repeatedly you hear the reassuring news that, 'its ok you're brain dissolves before you are buried anyway, so you might as well give it to us'.... Happened 3 times today!!
Wednesday, 15 April 2009
New Laptop
Thursday, 2 April 2009
Saturday, 28 March 2009
More Dream Stuff
Ok, so again last night I dreamt a song, except this time it was very vivid, I mean the words just came pouring into my head, like they'd already been sung somewhere else. I woke up and typed up what I could remember (probably about 1/3 of it) and then filled in the rest as best I could.
Without being able to play a bloody instrument all I can do is stick the lyrics up. Have a look, don't judge... Im not saying they are any good, just that it's incredibly wierd to get something like that coming out of nowhere, especially when most of my dreams arn't particularly vivid.
It's a homage to Phil Ochs (the man with the skull lol), my favourite folkie who had a very interesting life, one which has produced plenty of great eulogies over the years. The whole mtv thing has a couple of levels to it. He always thought that the best way to make a difference with music was to bring the words of the great thinkers and poets of our time and cross them with the elvis presley style mass pop music. Thats why he went through his gold suit phase and tried to find a way to appeal to the masses. I think a modern parallel might be if a political folkie of today like David Rovics were to play on mtv. Pretty much zero chance of it happening, but the same could be said of Ochs efforts back in the late 60's. The other side of it is that semi-selfish wish that maybe we would have another folk revival, like that of the 60's when the mainstream would embrace political music again...
BTW, he was never actually referred to as the highwayman, it was a song he adapted from the Alfred Noyes poem, but I think he might have liked it.
Anyway here goes:
He was the man who fought for change,
But for fortune he might have won,
He was the man who spoke for peace,
Though Dylan had him shunned,
The movement slowly died,
Sixty-Seven was history,
But he had no time for LSD,
He was too busy trying to protect our liberties.
He was the man who told us the war was over,
Long before the last troops left Vietnam,
He was there in Chicago,
When the tear gas struck them down,
And it wasn’t just for him,
That the sorrow hit so hard,
In his rehearsals for retirement we let him be,
Now Phillip David Ochs must rest in peace.
CHORUS:
You’ll march to no more battles,
There’ll be no more sad refrains,
We all saw your crucifixion,
You carried all that pain,
I wish I could have known you,
But one day we all shall see,
The highwayman go marchin’ on mtv,
One day we’ll see Phil Ochs on mtv.
The man who hung in far rockaway,
Was not the one who sung in Lincoln Park,
Now he’s just one more martyr,
We’ve got too many of them,
A hero to us all,
Though we didn’t see,
I still believe one day it just might be,
That the highwayman will go marchin’ on mtv.
Thursday, 26 March 2009
Marketing not quite as dull as one might think
Ok, maybe i've not made a mistake in taking sports marketing as a degree, but tonight's lecture on how to promote your club was certainly worth the trip. I have to admit that years of the Old Parks attitude to the outside world has left me missing some of the important points that sucessful clubs take on board. There were several key things:
Welcome - since when do you see old parks welcoming someone they dont know who turns up at the club? It is simple and we need to realise it can help change the clubs image.
Funding - It's no suprise that we are struggling to stay solvent. We have no real idea of the direction we are heading and we just dont organise enough events that tap into potential growth areas.
The Neighbourhood - We really need to sell ourselves to the local area. There must be plenty of people in Barkingside who would be interested in some aspect of Parks, but I can't think of anyone that actually comes from there. Most of us live miles away from the place. I'm going to take it upon myself to do some door to door advertising - to let people know that we are there and that they are welcome.
The next few years will be very important. We really need to increase our retention rate (which is something I had been worried about for a while) and make sure we follow up lapsed members. Most of all we need to know exactly why people stay with us and what we can do to improve. I dont think Ive ever heard anyone ask members whether they want anything new before, its all been a matter of 'this is the way it happens here'. We really need to change if we are to survive the coming years and we need to bring the club together socially more. It's just not feasible to stay as only cricket club any more.
Tuesday, 24 March 2009
Monday, 23 March 2009
Musical Dreams
Sunday, 22 March 2009
First Chance Averages
Having just watched Andrew Strauss' terrific effort today, I'm completely cheesed off with various people who decide to ignore the importance of an innings due to the batsman getting a let off at some point. Its utterly ridiculous.
I've had this argument with someone before, who keeps banging on about first chance averages (FCA) (ie. a batsman's average if you take them to be out after the first drop in their innings). They are useless. Firstly, are we to assume that cricket follows some strange system whereby random events such as drop catches and lucky breaks arn't following random patterns? The only way FCA's can have any use (i.e. arn't relative to normal averages) is if one batsman has more luck than another - and luck by definition is random and therefore will not give one batsman more chances than another over a good sample period.
It is completely logical to therefore ignore these chances in the context of evaluating a players career as long as:
a) Fielders dont have some sort of agreement to drop more catches of one batsman than another.
b) Umpires dont have a vendetta against a player.
I think its safe to assume this doesnt occur.
Ive also heard it said that some batsman are more likely to spurn chances than others being an argument for FCA's usefulness. This is negated by the fact that players giving more chances will be out more quickly anyway! FCA's are a complete waste of time.
Thursday, 19 March 2009
BBQ in march
Tuesday, 17 March 2009
More pope bashing
Click this link at your own risk, theres a picture of a dick awaiting you.
Evil Bastard.
Wednesday, 11 March 2009
More Cds
Saturday, 7 March 2009
Another post on personal liberties
Interesting post on reddit today. As usual this sort of debate always sparks a war of words from both sides, but some of the arguments laid down there are nicely put and I think I'd like to summarise my favourites here for later heated discussion. I am a fairly hard line libertarian for the most part I suppose, though I wouldn't call myself conservative in any way other than the fact I endorse small government and individual liberty. Without trying to take the best of both worlds, I guess I'd like to see a government based around promoting a society of cooperation and community without inpinging on important liberties such as freedom of speech (which is so often where communism falls flat on it's face).
I particularly find the idea of illegal drugs absurd. I think one should be allowed to say and do whatever they wish as long as they do not compromise others ability to do the same. I do not find this statement to be a 'cop out'. There are many areas where total freedom to do as we wish would damage others social freedom - one example of this would be climate change - I don't consider someone to have an absolute right to have a gas guzzling car for instance. Drugs on the other hand are a completely different issue - and here's why: Every externality that drugs lead to are already illegal! Sure, some drugs may lead to violence and thats why we have laws against physical abuse. Using the logic of those who condemn drugs, we should make alcohol illegal, advertising of any remotely harmful product illegal, football matches should be illegal, short skirts should be illegal, in fact if you want to take away negative effects on society you should start banning any activity which reduces peoples productivity - maybe video games, mobiles and tv? The difference between drugs and other crimes is simple. Violence, for example, has a direct damaging effect on anothers freedom, drugs 'might' lead to an infringement of anothers freedom. If we start making all these 'mights' unlawful, where do we stop? It's a frankly scary and endless road towards complete control of peoples lives.
Having said this I'm not against regulation. Areas such as gun crime in the US is a prime example of where proper regulation of these 'mights' are very important. The idea that anyone could go and buy a machine gun is horrifying to say the least.
Governments, in my opinion, are there to decide the way forward on large scale issues which cannot be decided on an individual level. I cannot speak for the nation on whether we should join the Euro, I believe that these sorts of decisions are questions best left to our democratically elected experts (not that we can't complain when they make mistakes). Individual issues, such as whether I drink or take drugs, as long as conducted in a responsible manner are none of the governments business in my opinion. If I then go on to commit a crime because of this, sure, you trial someone on that crime, but this should not be an issue if the population are well informed and regulated in an effective way.
One may say that is easier said than done, yet it seems to work so well in other areas. We dont criminalise skirts because they incite rape? We criminalise rape. Why are drugs any different? It's not as if criminalisation actually has a great deal of effect. I havent discussed some of the positive effects of regualtion over criminalisation, I have been merely focussing on a moral standpoint. By legalising drugs, we would instantly cut the need for criminal enforcement, saving billions and remove the need for criminal organisations on the grand scale that we have now. Regulation removes dangerous cut drugs from the black market, allows better healthcare and education to be afforded to users and creates an opportunity for taxation for the government.
Thursday, 5 March 2009
Reading
Wednesday, 4 March 2009
Frederick Douglass Kirkpatrick

Im gradually working my way through the smithsonian folkways catalogue (it may take some time!). Discovery of the week is Rev. Frederick Douglass Kirkpatrick. Very bluesy protest folk from the late 60s, with a great voice as well. The guy is a bit of a hero of the civil rights movement, setting up Deacons for Defence and Justice in 1964 to oppose the KKK in the south. Give it a go, the whole album is up on Spotify.
Sunday, 1 March 2009
Wednesday, 25 February 2009
Another Note
Baseball Has Started
Spring training starts today. At this very moment Im hearing the first ads of the season for "large pepperoni pizza". I love the American carefree attitude to snacking. They just dont give a shit. Fantastic.
The Phillies have made very few changes to their world series winning team of last year. Losing Pat Burrell was a shame as he was someone who was great to watch when he hit a hot streak, but theyve traded up in Ibanez. A few changes to the bullpen, which should hopefully not disturb the best pen in the league. All in all I think we're still better than the Mets. Also great to see Jamie Moyer still going for another 2 years. Hes going to be 48 and still playing in the Major leagues. I think it goes to show cricketers are retiring a little too early. No reason spinners like Murali cant go into their late 40s as long as they are up for it. Far too much pressure is put on the older players to 'make way' when they hit their mid 30s. In baseball, due to the franchise system, you play as long as you perform and want to. There are disadvantages to the franchise system, but Cricket could learn a lot I think.
Monday, 23 February 2009
Just recovering after a completely pointless day. Spent most of the morning gathering all my applications to show the jobcentre Im worth their paltry 25£ a week, which they refused to even look at. This is the so called interview you get every 3 months where you are supposed to prove you are looking for work. Of course I never had a problem as I've been a non stop application machine, but it slightly irks me that someone could have done bugger all in the way of job hunting and be earning 100's of pounds a week. Oh well...
Lastfm seem to have a lot of Tom Paxton, who is the only performer of note Ive had the opportunity or money to be able to see live. A famous product of the Greenwich Village scene, Tom writes about crack cocaine addiction and the lives of hookers, while looking like the sort of chap who should be dishing out Werthers Originals to his granchildren, while rocking in an armchair round a fire (maybe he does). Try his eulogy to the 9/11 firefighters who died in the twin towers The Bravest and this wonderful song. A true living legend.
